I've thought a lot about the comparisons between painting and writing. There are more similarities than you'd expect in the
processes. I invite you to play with some of these ideas with me.I try to work with many elements to create
a complete work. In writing, great dialogue, or wonderful descriptions of setting, or deep, insightful narration, or intense
action can't stand alone. It's better to weave these elements together. In painting I try to weave composition, color, detail
and saturation/hue.
In both arts I try to find insightful and constructive feedback.
I try to continue
to learn, expanding my skills by instruction and practice.
I keep exploring outside my comfort zone.
I
try to commit myself to projects that I'm passionate about.
It's best to work with a variety of emotions. Some
projects or aspects of projects make me laugh, cry, feel anger or caress me into a state of bliss while others frustrate me
or make me feel reflective or meditative. If I focus too much on one emotion and I wind up wallowing.
In painting
instructors often caution students against making mud. In writing, instructors talk about something becoming overworked.
It's the same problem. Mess around in one place too long and all the color and contrast and vibrancy of your work gets muddled
into a brownish gray. Try to polish and refine with a light touch, or just start over rather than mucking about until the
page is worn through.
Don't 'pet' the page. Petting in painting is a reference to hesitant strokes rather than
committing to a direction and strength of movement. Instead of creating a line with a single motion, it's petted and cajoled
into existence by multiple passes and erasures. In writing, the author toys endlessly with the language instead of reaching
into the heart of a scene. A symptom of writing via petting is the presence of an open thesaurus and a list of saidisms.
There are other comparisons. I challenge you to find them. Think
about detail, perspective, and communication with audience among other things. Have fun!